http://www.rodrig.com/2006/09/centos-static-routes/ you probably shouldn't be here Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:36:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.rodrig.com/2006/09/centos-static-routes/comment-page-1/#comment-1711 gonz Wed, 14 May 2008 19:04:53 +0000 http://www.rodrig.com/2006/09/29/centos-static-routes/#comment-1711 thanks - that did help! thanks – that did help!

]]> http://www.rodrig.com/2006/09/centos-static-routes/comment-page-1/#comment-1691 Jaco Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:19:18 +0000 http://www.rodrig.com/2006/09/29/centos-static-routes/#comment-1691 Yea well, the way RH does things has never made any sense to me. Thanks, this helped a lot. I don't think you need the explicit "dev eth0" bit, but it's probably safer to have it there explicitly. Yea well, the way RH does things has never made any sense to me. Thanks, this helped a lot. I don’t think you need the explicit “dev eth0″ bit, but it’s probably safer to have it there explicitly.

]]> http://www.rodrig.com/2006/09/centos-static-routes/comment-page-1/#comment-1598 David M. Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:38:30 +0000 http://www.rodrig.com/2006/09/29/centos-static-routes/#comment-1598 Thanks, this was quite helpful. Thanks, this was quite helpful.

]]> http://www.rodrig.com/2006/09/centos-static-routes/comment-page-1/#comment-1386 Shelly Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:21:26 +0000 http://www.rodrig.com/2006/09/29/centos-static-routes/#comment-1386 Are you speaking English?!?!?!? Are you speaking English?!?!?!?

]]>